Anyone else feel the campaign was bad?

[Smokey]

I ran through this campaign in literally 4 hours and just felt unsatisfied. The storyline was boring and it just didn't interest me at all. Am I the only one who felt Ghosts was pretty bad in terms of what was hyped up the year before and what we actually received?

 

[Glen_Imported3]

Definitely agree. There was literally TONS of space for improvement in this game altogether. I don't know what the developers were thinking, really. Did not live up to it's hype at all. At best, Ghosts was very mediocre.
However, I think that they made up for it with Advanced Warfare, which is pretty good actually.

 

[Lovely01]

No, I'd have to disagree. Well, in my opinion, Call of Duty is a very vivid lively game and it's movements are really up there in the charts. Even the storyline was pretty good...I loved every second of it. All of this made me want to play the campaign all over again, which I already did. I know this is your opinion, I'm not objecting to your opinion, because it's your opinion. But in my opinion, it wasn't bad at all. I was actually really stunned with the performance and how the movements were fluently running through the whole game. It gave me a sense of a fun, experimented adventure.

 

[Yoso123]

All the Call of Duty campaigns are bad in my opinion, and I think Ghosts should have ditched campaign to focus on Multiplayer. Not only does nobody play the campaign, but if you do, you'll end up quitting after the second generic mission. All COD games follow the same mantra:

Cinematic intro
Terrorists/Bad guys
Shoot
Shoot
Shoot
Shoot
Car chase
Shoot
Shoot
Ending, usually a dramatic death of someone we don't care about, or some kind of bomb.