• Greetings, Devil Dog! Welcome to the Call of Duty Forums. It looks like you're looking forward to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4, but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more.

CALL OF DUTY IS A GOVERNMENT PSYOP: These documents prove it.


Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II has been available for less than three weeks, but it is already making waves. Breaking records, within ten days, the first-person military shooter video game earned more than $1 billion in revenue. Yet it has also been shrouded in controversy, not least because missions include assassinating an Iranian general clearly based on Qassem Soleimani, a statesman and military leader slain by the Trump administration in 2020, and a level where players must shoot “drug traffickers” attempting to cross the U.S./Mexico border.

The Call of Duty franchise is an entertainment juggernaut, having sold close to half a billion games since it was launched in 2003. Its publisher, Activision Blizzard, is a giant in the industry, behind titles games as the Guitar Hero, Warcraft, Starcraft, Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater, Crash Bandicoot and Candy Crush Saga series.

Yet a closer inspection of Activision Blizzard’s key staff and their connections to state power, as well as details gleaned from documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, reveal that Call of Duty is not a neutral first-person shooter, but a carefully constructed piece of military propaganda, designed to advance the interests of the U.S. national security state.

MILITARY-ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX

It has long been a matter of public record that American spies have targeted and penetrated Activision Blizzard games. Documents released by Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA, CIA, FBI and Department of Defense infiltrated the vast online realms such as World of Warcraft, creating make-believe characters to monitor potential illegal activity and recruit informers. Indeed, at one point, there were so many U.S. spies in one video game that they had to create a “deconfliction” group as they were wasting time unwittingly surveilling each other. Virtual games, the NSA wrote, were an “opportunity” and a “target-rich communication network”.

However, documents obtained legally under the Freedom of Information Act by journalist and researcher Tom Secker and shared with MintPress News show that the connections between the national security state and the video game industry go far beyond this, and into active collaboration.

In September 2018, for example, the United States Air Force flew a group of entertainment executives – including Call of Duty/Activision Blizzard producer Coco Francini – to their headquarters at Hurlburt Field, Florida. The explicit reason for doing so, they wrote, was to “showcase” their hardware and to make the entertainment industry more “credible advocates” for the U.S. war machine.
 
We've known this for a while. There's even a video "documenting" it; during Advanced Warfare's development, they released this awesome video...

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEBBPeHpGss

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LaSD8oFBZE

But, besides that, Call of Duty has been partnered up with China for years going back to Call of Duty Online. However, China has upgraded their efforts enough that their development team became a second party for Activision. Its right there on the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II box, and as you load up Modern Warfare II.

I did an article about this. I did a semi-follow up article. With that second article, I uploaded a YouTube video...

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsLqPsROQos
 
who cares whoopy doo doo
Maybe it doesn't matter. But what did you think of the whole BLM messaging in MW 2019? That's part of this whole psyop. People don't get it; your games are getting worse because these developers are sneaking in stuff we don't want - like SBMM - which is basically Credit Scores for video games. Sometimes you play well, sometimes you don't. It's because SBMM is throttling your attributes. So, your MP5 may be playing a little bit different than the guy with the same exact build. This is what people are angry about.

What they're talking about here, though is that the military is subsidizing Call of Duty to promote their weaponry. Lazers just beamed Hawaii just this past weekend. Allow me to bring a video from 8 years ago:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bj3-RsyJKfA

Psyop, however in my opinion is more than just projecting propaganda - it's manipulating people to think a certain way to manipulate our enemies.
 
so that game exist because i want it ,it looks great.
And THAT's the crazy thing; Advanced Warfare was panned at launch. Not me bro. Advanced Warfare was actually pretty good. Single Player, and Multiplayer. It actually reminded me a little bit of MW2 from 2009.

Hell, I think Infinite Warfare was also a good game, it has the most interactive end credits, I've ever seen.
 

Like CODForums!

Advertisements

Back
Top